Publication date: September 2013
Source:Building and Environment, Volume 67
Author(s): Peter Barrett , Lucinda Barrett , Fay Davies
A general gap in knowledge around the holistic impact of spaces on human performance is identified. It is argued that filling this gap demands that the conceptual and methodological complexity of real world users' experiences of built spaces is addressed. It is argued that a potentially productive way forward is to use multi-level modelling within a neuroscience-informed, holistic sensory approach. Published results are highlighted in support of this approach, focused particularly on primary schools. The potential of expanding this approach to a full range of life-stages is then explored, building on a view of the brain as it evolves across the human life-span. The separation of left/right-brain cognitive processes emerges as being potentially important as an intervening variable. The schools' data is re-analysed by subject using multi-level modelling to provide, maybe for the first time, proof of concept evidence of variations in the optimal space characteristics depending on brain lateralisation. In addition significant differences are identified in the particular types of spaces involved and the relevant measures of human performance. These range from: classrooms and learning for school pupils; to offices and productivity for workers; to housing and well-being for the elderly. The train of argument is brought together around a vision for the development of a general model for holistic sensory space design. This would address a number of life-stages and, through a progressive meta-analysis, it is suggested that, over time, an evidenced, whole-life perspective on the holistic impact of spaces on human performance can be achieved.
![image]()
Source:Building and Environment, Volume 67
Author(s): Peter Barrett , Lucinda Barrett , Fay Davies
Graphical abstract
