Publication date: Available online 12 September 2013
Source:Building and Environment
Author(s): Rina Maiti
A controlled laboratory experiment was carried out on forty Indian male college students for evaluating the effect of indoor thermal environment on occupants’ response and thermal comfort. During experiment, indoor temperature varied from 21°C to 33°C, and the variables like relative humidity, airflow, air temperature and radiant temperature were recorded along with skin (T sk ) and oral temperature (T core ) from the subjects. From T sk and T c , body temperature (T b ) was evaluated. Subjective Thermal Sensation Vote (TSV) was recorded using ASHRAE 7-point scale. In PMV model, Fanger’s T sk equation was used to accommodate adaptive response. Stepwise regression analysis result showed T b was better predictor of TSV than T sk and T core . Regional skin temperature response, lower sweat threshold temperature with no dipping sweat and higher cutaneous sweating threshold temperature were observed as thermal adaptive responses. Using PMV model, thermal comfort zone was evaluated as (22.46-25.41)°C with neutral temperature of 23.91°C, whereas using TSV response, wider comfort zone was estimated as (23.25-26.32)°C with neutral temperature at 24.83°C. It was observed that PMV-model overestimated the actual thermal response. Interestingly, these subjects were found to be less sensitive to hot but more sensitive to cold. A new TSV-PPD relation (PPDnew ) was obtained with an asymmetric distribution of hot-cold thermal sensation response in Indians.
Source:Building and Environment
Author(s): Rina Maiti